"Best session so far."
"Fabulous presenter."
...read more testimonials
| NEWSLETTER | CONTACT | HOME |
 
Newsletters
2010
bulletThe perfect "eventless" fundraising event
Issue 7.10: Arts charity raises money year round: Pick a day, any day. And fund it.
bulletAre you a funds-raiser or a funds-depleter?
Issue 7.11: Basing your metrics on acquisition is like trying to bail a boat with a sieve. You work hard, but you still sink.
bulletDr. Sargeant says you're only doing half your job
Issue 7.12: And he has the data to prove it.
bulletRelease your inner archer: Learn to shoot message arrows
Issue 7.13: Targets? The vulnerable hearts and curious minds of your donors
bulletValuable direct mail concept absolutely free
Issue 7.14: Do you have the guts to try something different? My client didn't.
bulletDeciding what goes into your donor newsletter
Issue 7.15: Here's the easiest explanation I've ever come up with
bulletQualityspotting
Issue 7.16: How do you know when your donor materials are strong enough for the outside world?
bulletIdiot's guide to time management
Issue 8.1: I fidget, you fidget, we all fidget.
bulletDonor profiles in your newsletters: Worth the trouble?
Issue 8.2: They can lead to bigger things ... or nowhere. You decide.
bulletYoung heads are different heads
Issue 8.3: Are younger donors alive ... or dead to you?
bulletIs direct mail dead? (No, it's just dull.)
Issue 8.4: My goal? Entertain the heck out of the reader.
bullet"I'll never give you a penny again!" Music to my ears.
Issue 8.5: Here's a terrific direct mail concept the client refused to try. Take it if you want ... and if you dare.
bulletYour strategic plan = your case for support?
Issue 8.6: No! Don't! "The bridge is out"!!!
2009
bulletWriting a fabulous case is easy
Issue 7.7: You're just answering questions
bulletStraight to trash? The avoidable, sad fate of most annual reports
Issue 7.6: Entertain me with stories. Put stats in perspective.
bulletTake the Donor-Centered Pledge (or die)
Issue 7.5: 23 rules to live by (instead)
bullet"Deserving charity"? There's no such thing.
Issue 7.4: No one owes you a gift, as this "inside a donor's mind" report makes clear.
bulletI just wrote a couple of appeals for a big hospital. This time I took notes. Here's how to get a better letter.
Issue 7.3: Your next direct mail appeal: Will it burst into song?
bulletIf your paper newsletter is a flop, switching to electronic won't help.
Issue 7.2: Two key questions answered about newsletters
bulletDoes your boss or board chair get to approve your stuff? Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.
Issue 7.1: Sad but true: Most donor communications are built to fail
bulletBill's amazing "Warm Words" campaign
Issue 7.8: Bill Pratt decided to raise something other than money for once, and joyous response flooded in
bulletA campaign case is a series of talking points
Issue 7.9: Report from the front lines
2008
bullet"Hi. My name's Inertia. And I'll be disappointing you from this day forward. I know you have many obstacles to surmount, so I'm thrilled that you've named me Number One."
Issue 6.14: Meet the enemy: Inertia
bulletHow to write a good donor-centric headline
Issue 6.5: Writing a winning headline
bulletWould you buy a mattress from this charity?
Issue 6.3: What you do vs. why you matter
bulletWhy is giving by bequest so rare in the U.S.?
Issue 6.2: Reviving your "death brochure"
bulletAcquiring new donors through direct mail: Measuring success
Issue 6.1: Measuring donor acquisition programs
bulletCan direct mail be a cash cow for smaller nonprofits? Think "cash calves" instead.
Issue 6.13: Mass-market expectations yield disappointing results at local levels. Take heart, though: direct mail is about far more than instant cash.
bulletWhy won't paper die?
Issue 6.12: Everyone's drumming their fingers, waiting for paper to expire as a communications medium. Sorry.
bulletThe dirty truth about cases
Issue 6.11: Bitter truth? Maybe a quarter of the cases I'm hired to write never reach the finish line. Interesting tale, that.
bulletWhen you're feeling a little irrelevant...
Issue 6.10: Do you know the real you? The one donors really care about? Likely not, thanks to the "curse of knowledge." But there's an easy way (fun, too) to see yourself anew. Read on.
bulletRichard Radcliffe has your back
Issue 6.9: Are you marketing bequests? (Right.) Or "planned gifts"? (Wrongo.)
bulletObama's Web 3.0 campaign: Rewarding role model? Or risky distraction?
Issue 6.8: Are e-newsletters dead?
bulletWhat is news?
Issue 6.7: Making donor news the right way
bulletDoes your stuff suffer from jargon breath?
Issue 6.6: Adopt a zero-jargon policy and you'll raise more money
2007
bulletHow to make your billion-dollar goal?
Issue 5.9: No Ph.D. OK needed for your case
bulletTo make it into pile #3, know what you're selling
Issue 5.8: Selling hope
bulletWant to raise more support? Want to retain more donors?
Issue 5.7: Donor-centric pledge
bulletWhat do we call it?
Issue 5.6: Case themes
bulletWhy pay thousands to have an expert tell you what you're doing wrong? Do it yourself.
Issue 5.5: Ready for your self-audit?
bulletWhat to tell a second-guessing boss about good communications
Issue 5.4: Dear Boss
bulletThree improving things I learned last year
Issue 5.3: 2007's "eureka" moments
bulletMolehill bequests grow into mountains, if permanently endowed
Issue 5.2: Bring this up when you're promoting bequests
bulletMake your case and write the donor into the story
Issue 5.1: Donor = solution. It's your job to mention that more than once.
2006
bulletTrust = Giving + Retention
Issue 4.5: What are donor newsletters for?
bulletFundraising communications: Cost or investment?
Issue 4.4: Building donor relationships
bulletYou're writing, but they're not reading. Improve your odds.
Issue 4.3: Getting them to read
bulletOn the delicate subject of ED, committee, and board approvals
Issue 4.2: Approvals
bulletRaise the problem, be the solution
Issue 4.1: Emotional twin sets
2005
2004
bulletDisconnecting the dots: "Visibility" and fundraising success
Issue 2.6: Visibility
bulletYou love stats. But do stats love you?
Issue 2.5: Using statistical evidence
bulletWant more response? Get all emotional.
Issue 2.4: Emotional triggers
bulletWhy people ignore your newsletter
Issue 2.3: Newsletter basics...
bulletWhy people ignore your newsletter
Issue 2.2: Newsletter basics...
bulletWhy people ignore your newsletter
Issue 2.1: Newsletter basics...
2003
bulletA surefire story formula
Issue 1.7: Case basics...
bulletThe Abraham Lincoln lesson
Issue 1.6: Case basics...
bulletAre you interesting (especially to donors)?
Issue 1.5: Communications basics...
bulletBottom-Liners leap to conclusions (and that's a good thing)
Issue 1.4: Part four of four personality types...
bulletExpressives crave the new
Issue 1.3: Part three of four personality types...
bulletAmiables: Smile and say "Howdy!"
Issue 1.2: Part two of four personality types...
bulletAnalytical types: Good to the last objection
Issue 1.1: Part one of four personality types...
How to write a good donor-centric headline
Issue 6.5: Writing a winning headline

Patti Saunders, director of development at The Arc of Anchorage, a nonprofit human service organization with hundreds of employees, wrote the following article for her donor newsletter.

It's a little harder these days for Jane to use the stairs. Like other aging Baby Boomers, life would be easier if she lived in a ranch-style home. Jane is one of many Baby Boomers in Anchorage who experiences an intellectual disability.

The Arc of Anchorage has gotten the message, loud and clear. "As the people we serve age, their needs change, just like they do for any senior citizen," said Gwen Lee, Executive Director. "We need to adjust the services we offer to meet those changing needs. And the prime change is the need for accessible housing."

As a result, The Arc has begun investing in one-story housing. A three-bedroom home on Old Harbor Road in Muldoon was the first purchase. The Arc used proceeds from the sale of two-story and split level properties to fund the purchase.

"The board of directors looked at the demographics. Accessible housing is already in great demand - both for aging baby boomers and for people with complex medical conditions," said Rod Shipley, chair of the board. "The demand is only going to get larger, which is why accessible housing for the people we serve is one of our highest long-range priorities."

Plans to move three women and a staff person into the house on Old Harbor Road are well underway. The Arc plans to add a wing to the house to accommodate up to four more people.

Nice article, Patti. Brief yet comprehensive. With a dash of anecdote. And it mentions an important trend; trends are always and intrinsically newsworthy. Don't change a thing.

This was Patti's draft headline:

Ranch House Purchase Marks New Direction for Residential Services.
As the people we serve get older, the need for accessible homes is greater.

Job #1 for a headline is this: convey to a rapidly skimming reader the gist of the story. Patti's headline accomplished that, in an economical 23 words.

I'd like a stronger hook, is all. And zero jargon, if possible. A "no jargon" policy means deleting insider shorthand like "residential services" and "accessible."

Patti invited me to try my hand. So I wrote myself a question on my omnipresent yellow pad: What is the pivot of this story?

Answer: Selling multi-level housing in favor of single-level housing, to better accommodate an aging population. And why was The Arc of Anchorage doing that? To eliminate stairs. Now I had a hook.

With that, I could write a plain English statement of what I considered the gist of the story: Stairs prove to be obstacle for The Arc's aging baby boomers, forcing the agency to trade in multi-level housing for one-story housing. Demand for such housing is increasing.

Then I tried to make it hookier (eliminate words, add some flair) -- and introduce some kind of donor angle:

A Farewell to Stairs
As aging baby boomers begin to complain, "Oh, my aching knees," The Arc buys its first ranch house. More will be needed.

What's the donor angle? "More will be needed."

Are we asking for money yet for additional single-story homes? No. But a donor newsletter is the place where you talk about things that are happening in your world, so that if you do directly seek gifts some day, through an appeal, your donor base is more familiar with the issue.

Takeaway: Headlines matter far more than articles to getting your messages across. Four out of five readers never penetrate past the headline, recent research by the Poynter Institute showed. Yet the vast majority of what purport to be headlines in nonprofit publications are not really headlines at all; they're just bigger type.

Remember: the purpose of a headline in journalism is to summarize the gist of the story. You should be able to hide your article beneath a sheet of blank paper and still know pretty much exactly what the story's about just by reading the headline.

And to wrap up this discussion of headlines, here's a favorite example of a well-written one, from today's AOL News: Woman sees image of Virgin Mary in her brain scan.
Tom Ahern, tagline judge
Nancy Schwartz has asked me to help judge her wildly popular Tagline Awards Program in the summer of 2010. Of course, I said yes. And I am advertising that fact because, of course, I am unbribable. Although some judges like homemade fudges; just saying. Download her 2009 Nonprofit Tagline Report.
Copyright © 2009 by Tom Ahern and Ahern Communications, Ink. All rights reserved. 401-397-8104.
Site credits & acknowledgements.